By: Edd Hurt |
Thursday February 24, 2005 |
Genrerock PublisherSub Pop External Links |
It takes a lot of concentration to play simple music; it takes a belief in
the ritualistic aspects of what you're doing. The music found on Blue
Cathedral is simple-- standard mutant post-blues/surf-music riffs (OK,
post-Haight? post-Hawkwind? post-Blue Cheer? Where do you think all those
lysergic San Francisco bands got the raw material for their music, forty
years ago?) played over and over, some loose but not jazzy drumming, and a
lot of stratospheric guitar (and sax). And vocals, although I have
absolutely no idea what the guy is singing about--I don't listen to music
through headphones myself. Even then, I don't think I could understand too
much of Ethan Miller's insanely echoplexed vocals, and anyway this is an
album on which the instrumentals are the thing. Let me mention the
drummer's name--Utrillo Kushner.
I guess the best way to approach this is to listen to it as if it were
jazz--concentrate on the repetition. Since there's virtually nothing of any
real harmonic or even rhythmic interest here, I don't know how else to
appreciate it. There are a few moments where saxophone comes into the
picture and I think of early Pere Ubu played sideways; "Pussy Foot the Duke"
sounds like Comets on Fire have a sense of humor--it's a goofy little piece
with a nice cheap organ sound, and it's probably the most interesting piece
of pure music here. There are moments when you think, "hmm, this could be
even more successful if only they had paid more attention to making it
harmonically and rhythmically interesting, surprising, because then they
could've gotten the drummer to roll around as he does here and the added
stratospheric guitars and insanely echoplexed vocals would've perhaps been
thrown in greater relief." But that's a pop fan talking. And I'm enough of
a pop fan to realize that what they're after is a re-creation of classic
psychedelica and to say that they pull it off.
So I don't know, this is pretty nice--I find myself smiling as I listen, and
if these days I indulged in the various substances sold by my local
operating out of a brown El Camino, ask for Clark, near the swingset in the
back parking lot of the First Baptist Church, I would probably smile even
more. For this pop fan it works best in small doses. To the credit of
Comets on Fire, they do keep things fairly concise. Nice and speedy, barely
turgid at all. So that's good; still, I am not totally sure I know
why they play this music, or what it is they wish to get across. Beyond
re-creating psychedelica--sure, I'm a fan of early Floyd, I like some
Quicksilver, Julian Cope, etc. There are two songs that have "whiskey" as
part of the title. As pure sensation it has its moments, just as many
recordings by out-and-out jam bands do. I guess what I'm trying to say is
that I wish more actually happened here--my belief in the ritualistic aspect
of what they do comes and goes, you see.